Anti-Weaponization Case Builder · Unclaimed
1 watching
Hey George — your J6 Anti-Weaponization Case Builder profile is ready to be claimed.
Claim it. Build your case. Free, forever.
This profile was set up so George can take it over and build a personal record of what happened. It is part of a larger effort to put every January 6 defendant's case in public, side by side with Ryan Nichols's — one master record the government cannot bury.
If you ARE George Pierre Tanios, claim this profile. Ryan will personally verify your claim against the DOJ docket before it goes live. Only one verified claim per profile.
If you're not George but you know who should be — use the tip line below.
Claiming requires a free account so only you can edit your profile once verified. You'll be asked to sign in on the next page.
Stand with George Pierre Tanios — tap to react, no signup
The record, so far
**Codefendant of Julian Khater in case 1:21-cr-222 (the Capitol pepper-spray incident involving Officer Brian Sicknick).** Pleaded guilty 7/27/22 — roughly five weeks **before** Khater's plea on 9/1/22. Sentenced 1/27/23 to **time served** (plus 12 months supervised release, $50 assessment, $500 restitution), while his codefendant Khater was sentenced the same day in the same case to **80 months of incarceration**, $10,000 fine, and $2,000 restitution. --- ### Eyewitness account — Ryan Nichols (@RealRyanNichols) Ryan Nichols, a fellow January 6 defendant who was held at the D.C. Jail during the pretrial period of this case and was pardoned by President Donald J. Trump on January 20, 2025 (charges dismissed with prejudice), has stated publicly and on the record: > "I personally heard George Tanios telling federal investigators that his codefendant Julian Khater committed all of the alleged actions and that George himself had done nothing. He was squealing like a pig to the feds about how Julian did it all and he didn't do anything. It was pathetic." This is **first-person eyewitness testimony from a named, identifiable individual** who was present in the same facility during the relevant period. ### What the public record shows on its own - **Same arrest day** (3/15/21), same indictment (3/17/21), same case number (1:21-cr-222), same court, same sentencing judge. - **Tanios pleaded first** (7/27/22, with an *information* filed the same day — a procedural marker often associated with cooperation pleas). - **Khater pleaded later** (9/1/22) — and received an 80-month custodial sentence. - **Both sentenced on the same day** (1/27/23) — Tanios walked with time served; Khater went to federal prison. The sentencing disparity, on its own, does not legally establish cooperation. Combined with Ryan Nichols's eyewitness testimony above, the public record is consistent with the pattern he describes. DOJ defendant page: https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/defendants/tanios-george
The case file
On the record
- Case number
- 1:21-cr-222
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- Disposition
- Arrested on 3/15/21. Initial appearance held 3/15/21. Indicted 3/17/21. Arraigned 4/13/21 and pleaded not guilty to all counts. Information filed 7/27/22. Pleaded gulity 7/27/22. Sentenced 1/27/23. Sentenced to Time served, 12 months supervised release, $50 special assesment, Restitution $500.
- Arrested
- March 15, 2021
- Sentenced
- January 27, 2023
Sentence
Time served, 12 months supervised release, $50 special assesment, Restitution $500
How verification works
- 1
You claim the profile
Sign in (or sign up free), then submit your DOJ case number, a mugshot or pardon record, or a court document showing this is you. Takes a couple minutes.
- 2
Ryan reviews it personally
Every claim is checked by Ryan against the DOJ docket and public record. Imposters get rejected. You only need to do this once.
- 3
Profile becomes yours
Once approved, this page comes down and a fresh case-builder takes its place. You can upload photos, scanned documents, embedded TikTok / YouTube / X videos, your testimony in your own words. Everything you upload waits for review before going public.
Why this matters for George
Most J6 defendant case files sit locked inside law firms. The public hears soundbites. They do not see the grievance forms denied without a hearing. They do not see the water shut off. They do not see four years of constitutional rights violated, one piece of paper at a time.
We put it in public. All of it. Every defendant who joins. One airtight record the government cannot refute. That is how this case is won.