Ryan Nichols

Public January 6 profile · ready to claim

Cepane Jo Sarty

January 6 case-file subject

Archive identity card for Cepane Jo Sarty; verified portrait not yet availableArchive card · not a photograph
A verified, rights-cleared likeness has not been approved for this profile yet.Suggest a verified portrait →

Cepane Jo Sarty is a Marietta, Georgia man who stood beside his brother and walked out of federal court with no conviction on his name. Thirty-eight years old. Prosecuted alongside his brother, Seth Eden Sarty. Two Georgia brothers, one indictment, and a case the United States government eventually asked the court to throw out forever. ## The legal fight The FBI filed a statement of facts on January 19, 2024. Cepane Sarty was arrested in Georgia on February 5, 2024, more than three years after January 6, 2021. A grand jury indicted each brother on two felony counts and six misdemeanors: civil disorder; assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers; entering and remaining in restricted grounds; disorderly and disruptive conduct in restricted grounds; physical violence in restricted grounds; disorderly conduct in a Capitol building; act of physical violence in Capitol grounds or buildings; and parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building. On March 22, 2024, Cepane Sarty pleaded NOT GUILTY to every count. A jury trial was set for June 2, 2025. It never happened. On January 21, 2025, the government moved to dismiss the indictment WITH PREJUDICE under Rule 48(a). Cepane consented. On January 24, 2025, Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly granted the motion, dismissed the indictment with prejudice, vacated the release orders and the trial schedule, denied the pending motions as moot, and closed the case. ## What the record shows FACT: Cepane Jo Sarty was never convicted. No plea of guilty. No verdict. No sentence. The indictment was dismissed with prejudice on January 24, 2025 and cannot be refiled. CHARGE ONLY: every description of his conduct on January 6 comes from a government probable cause affidavit and an indictment. Those are allegations. No jury ever weighed them. This archive does not convert an untested allegation into a fact, for anyone, ever. DOCUMENTED INFERENCE: the Rule 48(a) dismissal followed the January 20, 2025 presidential directive concerning pending January 6 cases. The court's order, not the proclamation, is the controlling disposition in Cepane's case. NEEDS AUTHENTICATION: a review of the Office of the Pardon Attorney recipient listing returned an entry for Seth Eden Sarty but no entry for Cepane. The archive does not infer a person-specific certificate without the document. ## What still needs to be captured The native indictment, the dismissal motion, the defense responses, the native dismissal order, the full docket, an authenticated firsthand statement from Cepane, and a dignified photograph with verified provenance. No portrait is assigned. Government evidentiary images are preserved as source material and are not reused as a man's face on his own profile. ## Case record - Case: 1:24-cr-00130-CKK, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia - Judge: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly - Magistrate matter: 1:24-mj-00019-MAU - Arrest: February 5, 2024, Georgia - Plea: Not guilty, all counts, March 22, 2024 - Disposition: Indictment dismissed with prejudice, January 24, 2025 Show me the evidence. In this file there is no conviction to show. This profile is unclaimed. If this is you, or your family, claiming it is free, forever.

The case file

On the record

Case number
1:24-cr-00130-CKK
Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Judge
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Disposition
Pleaded not guilty March 22, 2024; consented to government dismissal request; indictment dismissed with prejudice under Rule 48(a) on January 24, 2025; no conviction or sentence.
Arrested
February 5, 2024

Charges

  • Government allegation: civil disorder, 18 U.S.C. § 231(a)(3) (dismissed with prejudice)
  • Government allegation: assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers, 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1) (dismissed with prejudice)
  • Government allegation: entering and remaining in a restricted building or grounds, 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1) (dismissed with prejudice)
  • Government allegation: disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds, 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2) (dismissed with prejudice)
  • Government allegation: engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds, 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(4) (dismissed with prejudice)
  • Government allegation: disorderly conduct in a Capitol building, 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D) (dismissed with prejudice)
  • Government allegation: act of physical violence in Capitol grounds or a building, 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(F) (dismissed with prejudice)
  • Government allegation: parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a Capitol building, 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G) (dismissed with prejudice)

Sentence

No sentence imposed; indictment dismissed with prejudice before trial.

Public knowledge · no paywall

This profile is free for anyone to read.

Sign-in is only required to claim ownership, manage a claimed profile, or suggest a factual correction. Reading and sharing the public record never requires an account.

A free account is required for either action so submissions remain tied to a real person and can be reviewed.

18views0shares

Tap how this hits you — no signup, everyone sees the count

Connection to United States v. Nichols

Cepane Jo Sarty appears in the record of United States v. Nichols through 4 shared documents on file below. The full case — timeline, people, documents — is public and free.

Walk the whole case →

Evidence on file

4 documents on file

Court1 document

Court orders, rulings, transcripts, and docket entries.

Govt response3 documents

Responses from DC DOC, the U.S. Marshals, and federal agencies.