Ryan Nichols

Anti-Weaponization Case Builder · Unclaimed

5 watching

Hey Arthur — your J6 Anti-Weaponization Case Builder profile is ready to be claimed.

Claim it. Build your case. Free, forever.

This profile was set up so Arthur can take it over and build a personal record of what happened. It is part of a larger effort to put every January 6 defendant's case in public, side by side with Ryan Nichols's — one master record the government cannot bury.

If you ARE Arthur Jackman, claim this profile. Ryan will personally verify your claim against the DOJ docket before it goes live. Only one verified claim per profile.

If you're not Arthur but you know who should be — use the tip line below.

Claiming requires a free account so only you can edit your profile once verified. You'll be asked to sign in on the next page.

Stand with Arthur Jackman — tap to react, no signup

The record, so far

Arthur Jackman of Orlando, Florida comes from a law-enforcement household — his wife serves as an Orange County sheriff's deputy (FACT — ClickOrlando; FOX 35 Orlando). The government indicted him on seven counts, including felony obstruction. He was never charged as a plotter (FACT — AP reporting via Anchorage Daily News). Then the law caught up with the charges. After the Supreme Court's Fischer decision undercut the January 6 obstruction theory, prosecutors began dropping those counts across the Proud Boys cases (FACT — AP). In August 2024, Jackman pleaded guilty to a single misdemeanor — entering and remaining in a restricted building. The rest of the indictment was dropped (FACT — ClickOrlando; FOX 35). Seven counts in. One misdemeanor out. Sentencing was set for December 6, 2024. On January 20, 2025, President Trump's clemency proclamation ended the January 6 cases across the board — full pardons for convictions and dismissal of what remained (FACT). THE CASE RECORD Case No. 1:21-cr-378, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Arrested 3/30/21; initial appearance 4/28/21. Indicted 5/26/21; superseding indictment 7/7/21; pleaded not guilty to all counts and remained on personal recognizance throughout. Pleaded guilty 8/28/24 to entering and remaining in a restricted building (misdemeanor); remaining counts dropped under the plea deal. This profile is unclaimed. If this is you — or your family — claiming it is free, forever.

The case file

On the record

Case number
1:21-cr-378
Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Disposition
Arrested 3/30/21. Initial appearance held 4/28/21. Indicted 5/26/21. Arraigned 6/8/21 where he pleaded not guilty to counts 1-6. Superseding indictment issued on 7/7/21. Arraigned 8/5 and pleaded not guilty to all counts. Status conference set for 10/1 at 3:30 pm. Defendant remains on personal recognizance.
Arrested
March 30, 2021

Charges

  • Obstruction of an Official Proceeding
  • Knowingly Entering or Remaining in any Restricted Building or Grounds Without Lawful Authority and Engage in Disruptive and Disorderly Conduct

How verification works

  1. 1

    You claim the profile

    Sign in (or sign up free), then submit your DOJ case number, a mugshot or pardon record, or a court document showing this is you. Takes a couple minutes.

  2. 2

    Ryan reviews it personally

    Every claim is checked by Ryan against the DOJ docket and public record. Imposters get rejected. You only need to do this once.

  3. 3

    Profile becomes yours

    Once approved, this page comes down and a fresh case-builder takes its place. You can upload photos, scanned documents, embedded TikTok / YouTube / X videos, your testimony in your own words. Everything you upload waits for review before going public.

Why this matters for Arthur

Most J6 defendant case files sit locked inside law firms. The public hears soundbites. They do not see the grievance forms denied without a hearing. They do not see the water shut off. They do not see four years of constitutional rights violated, one piece of paper at a time.

We put it in public. All of it. Every defendant who joins. One airtight record the government cannot refute. That is how this case is won.