EventMarch 30, 2026· Washington, D.C.

Court denies Brian Mock and Cindy Young intervention in Dunn v. Austin

Judge Dabney L. Friedrich denied Mock’s and Young’s motions to intervene in the January 6 plaque litigation. The ruling addressed Article III standing and permissive intervention and did not resolve the truth of their broader firsthand assertions.

0views0comments0shares

Evidence on file

1 document on file

Court1 document

Court orders, rulings, transcripts, and docket entries.

ruling · Mar 30, 2026

Dunn v. Austin — Opinion Denying Brian Mock and Cindy Young Intervention

An 11-page March 30, 2026 memorandum opinion in Dunn v. Austin denied Brian Mock’s and Cindy Lou Young’s motions to intervene in litigation concerning the congressionally directed January 6 law-enforcement plaque. The ruling addressed standing and permissive intervention; it did not decide the truth or falsity of their broader firsthand claims about January 6, detention, stigma, public history, or government conduct.

Read

Discussion

Comments here become part of the public record. Moderated.

No approved comments yet. Create an account and add the first case note.

Add to the record

Create an account to comment on this case.

Bring the opinion, question, or missing context that other platforms bury. Comments are signed-only, moderated, and tied to one real profile.

Join and comment Already have an account?community rules

Support Ryan's rebuild — every dollar funds keeping this record public.