Dunn v. Austin — Opinion Denying Brian Mock and Cindy Young Intervention

An 11-page March 30, 2026 memorandum opinion in Dunn v. Austin denied Brian Mock’s and Cindy Lou Young’s motions to intervene in litigation concerning the congressionally directed January 6 law-enforcement plaque. The ruling addressed standing and permissive intervention; it did not decide the truth or falsity of their broader firsthand claims about January 6, detention, stigma, public history, or government conduct.

Source: U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia; Justia docket-hosted court opinion

Open at the source →

This record stays public because the work sells, not begs — get the book or get your own case built like this.