Fighting Shadows $29.99 →
Ryan Nichols
Join

The January 6 Files

Where do you
want to start?

Two ways in. Both free, both public.

You are here

One man’s case

1,463

days, arrest to pardon

Read Ryan’s case

Everyone else

1,557

defendants indexed

Search the archive

26 matches for "Oath Keepers": 0 grievances · 5 events · 0 people · 21 documents.

Who's namedView as graph

  1. Jury Returns Joseph Hackett Verdict

    A federal jury returned verdicts in the second Oath Keepers trial. The DOJ reported findings against Joseph Hackett on five counts. Government descriptions of the alleged conduct remain attributed to the prosecution and trial record.

    📍 U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

    Read

  2. Government files sentencing memorandum for Sandra Parker and four co-defendants

    In ECF No. 1018, prosecutors presented sentencing arguments concerning Sandra Parker, Bennie Parker, Laura Steele, Connie Meggs, and William Isaacs. The filing calculated a 97-to-121-month advisory range for Sandra Parker and three co-defendants and advocated significant imprisonment. These were prosecution positions, not the court’s final sentences. ECF No. 1021 filed the next day stated that footnote 9 was corrected; the corrected attachment remains uncaptured.

    📍 U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

    Read

  3. D.C. Circuit Vacates Oath Keepers Judgments

    Published reporting and the court-file index indicate that the D.C. Circuit vacated the affected Oath Keepers judgments and remanded for consideration of a government motion to dismiss. The native appellate order remains a capture target.

    📍 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

    Read

  4. Government Files Oath Keepers Dismissal Motion

    The government filed ECF No. 967, an unopposed motion seeking dismissal of the indictment with prejudice. The motion did not itself end the case.

    📍 U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

    Read

  5. Court Defers Ruling on Oath Keepers Dismissal

    Judge Amit P. Mehta entered ECF No. 976 on May 29, 2026, deferring a ruling on the government’s unopposed Rule 48(a) motion to dismiss the indictment with prejudice. Citing United States v. Ammidown, the court required a statement of reasons and underlying factual basis and directed the government to supplement its motion by June 5, 2026. The order was not a denial on the merits and did not finally dismiss the case.

    📍 U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

    Read