Ryan Nichols

Public January 6 profile · ready to claim

Robert Westbury

January 6 defendant

Archive identity card for Robert Westbury; verified portrait not yet availableArchive card · not a photograph
A verified, rights-cleared likeness has not been approved for this profile yet.Suggest a verified portrait →

Robert Westbury is a 62-year-old husband and father from Lindstrom, Minnesota, a small Chisago County town an hour north of the Twin Cities. He went to Washington with his son. He came home to a federal case that took more than three years to end. It ended with the government asking a judge to throw it out for good. THE MAN AND HIS FAMILY FACT: Robert Westbury of Lindstrom, Minnesota was 62 when federal charges were filed. (Source: NPR January 6 case database, compiled from federal court records.) FACT: He is the husband of Rosemarie Westbury and the father of Isaac Westbury, who was charged alongside him. A third Lindstrom man, Aaron James, was charged in the same case. All three were arrested in Lindstrom on October 4, 2021. FACT: A sitting Minnesota state senator, Mark Koran, publicly vouched for the Westbury family and asked his own supporters to help them, writing: "They are a good family!" (Source: Minnesota Reformer.) That is not a defense lawyer talking. That is a neighbor holding a state senate seat, on the record, about the Westburys of Lindstrom. FACT: Robert Westbury was released on personal recognizance on October 12, 2021. He was never detained pending trial. (Source: American Gulag case file.) THE CHARGES, AND ONLY THE CHARGES CHARGE ONLY: Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building or Grounds; Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds; Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building; Parading, Demonstrating, or Picketing in a Capitol Building. All four are misdemeanors. FACT: Robert Westbury pleaded NOT GUILTY to every count and never wavered. A jury trial was set for August 4, 2025. HOW IT ENDED FACT: On January 21, 2025, the court granted the government motion to dismiss the case WITH PREJUDICE. Dismissed with prejudice means it is over. The government cannot bring it back. He was never convicted of anything. FACT: On January 20, 2025, President Trump granted clemency covering the January 6 prosecutions. Robert Westbury never served a day of incarceration on this case. THE RECORD Case 1:21-cr-605, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Charging document on file at CourtListener. DOJ defendant page archived before justice.gov removed the Capitol Breach list. Three years and three months of a federal case against a 62-year-old Minnesota father. No conviction. No sentence. Dismissed with prejudice. The record does not lie. This profile is unclaimed. If this is you, or your family, claiming it is free, forever.

The case file

On the record

Case number
1:21-cr-605
Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Disposition
Arrested 10/4/2021. Released on personal recognizance 10/12/2021. Pleaded not guilty to all charges. Jury trial set 8/4/2025. On 1/21/2025 the court granted the government motion to dismiss the case WITH PREJUDICE.
Arrested
October 4, 2021

Charges

  • Entering and Remaining in a Restricted Building or Grounds
  • Disorderly and Disruptive Conduct in a Restricted Building or Grounds
  • Disorderly Conduct in a Capitol Building
  • Parading, Demonstrating or Picketing in a Capitol Building

Public knowledge · no paywall

This profile is free for anyone to read.

Sign-in is only required to claim ownership, manage a claimed profile, or suggest a factual correction. Reading and sharing the public record never requires an account.

A free account is required for either action so submissions remain tied to a real person and can be reviewed.

4views0shares

Tap how this hits you — no signup, everyone sees the count

Connection to United States v. Nichols

Robert Westbury appears in the record of United States v. Nichols through 2 shared documents on file below. The full case — timeline, people, documents — is public and free.

Walk the whole case →

Evidence on file

2 documents on file