Ryan Nichols

Public January 6 profile · ready to claim

Nathan Erik Breese

January 6 defendant

Nathan Erik Breese profile photograph from NPR's January 6 archiveDocumented editorial-use image
NPR's The Capitol Charges; database photo credit: Department of Justice (all named credit exceptions excluded) Published for archive identification and reporting; reuse rights are not represented as cleared.Image source →

Nathan Erik Breese is a Port Byron, New York man whose federal case never made it to a plea, a trial, or a sentence. It just ended. FACT: court records show Breese was arrested July 24, 2024, in Syracuse, more than three years after January 6, 2021, on charges of entering a restricted building, disorderly conduct, and parading in the Capitol. FACT: he was never convicted of anything. On February 20, 2025, the court granted the government's own motion to dismiss the case with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled. Ever. There isn't a public statement of facts widely reported on Breese's specific conduct that day, and no news coverage has surfaced beyond the court docket itself. NEEDS AUTHENTICATION: the underlying allegations against him were never tested in court, and the case against him is closed for good. Nathan Breese was one of the later arrests in the whole Capitol investigation, three and a half years after the fact, and one of the defendants whose case simply ended when the government chose not to pursue it further. No guilty plea. No conviction. No sentence. Three and a half years is a long time to wait on a knock at the door. Nathan Breese waited that long, got arrested in Syracuse, and then watched the same government that charged him ask a judge to throw the case out. That's not a technicality lost in the fine print. That's the record closing the book on its own. For a man from a small town like Port Byron, New York, a federal case is a heavy thing to carry even before a single hearing happens. This one carried for seven months, arrest to dismissal, and then it was gone. What this doesn't prove: it doesn't establish his job, his family, or what happened on January 6 beyond the charging document, since the case was dismissed before any of it was tested in court. What it does prove: he was charged, and the government dropped the case with prejudice before it went anywhere. CASE RECORD U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Arrested July 24, 2024, in Syracuse, NY. Case dismissed with prejudice February 20, 2025 on the government's own motion. This profile is unclaimed. If this is you, or your family, claiming it is free, forever.

The case file

On the record

Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Disposition
Arrested 7/24/2024 in Syracuse, NY. On 2/20/2025, court granted the government's motion to dismiss the case with prejudice. No plea or conviction entered.
Arrested
July 24, 2024

Public knowledge · no paywall

This profile is free for anyone to read.

Sign-in is only required to claim ownership, manage a claimed profile, or suggest a factual correction. Reading and sharing the public record never requires an account.

A free account is required for either action so submissions remain tied to a real person and can be reviewed.

4views0shares

Tap how this hits you — no signup, everyone sees the count

Connection to United States v. Nichols

Nathan Erik Breese appears in the record of United States v. Nichols. The full case — timeline, people, documents — is public and free.

Walk the whole case →

Evidence on file

No scans linked yet

No scans linked to this entry yet. Curating is ongoing — check back.