EventOctober 15, 2025· U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Court partly denies and partly holds Daniel Morrissey’s Rule 60 motion in abeyance

Judge Reggie B. Walton denied without prejudice the portions of Morrissey’s Rule 60(b)(3) motion seeking damages against former counsel and the prosecutor, held the remaining portions in abeyance, and denied without prejudice an emergency monetary-relief motion. Morrissey’s allegations remained claims, not adjudicated findings.

6views0comments0shares

Evidence on file

1 document on file

Court1 document

Court orders, rulings, transcripts, and docket entries.

External sourceverify at the original source

order · Oct 15, 2025

October 15, 2025 Order in United States v. Daniel Morrissey

Docket-extracted text of Judge Reggie B. Walton’s October 15, 2025 order confirms Morrissey’s plea, initial sentence, 2024 appellate remand and resentencing, the court’s post-pardon treatment of his Section 2255 motion, and the partial denial and partial abeyance of his Rule 60 motion. The native filed PDF remains a priority capture target.

Read

Discussion

Comments here become part of the public record. Moderated.

No approved comments yet. Create an account and add the first case note.

Add to the record

Create an account to comment on this case.

Bring the opinion, question, or missing context that other platforms bury. Comments are signed-only, moderated, and tied to one real profile.

Join and comment Already have an account?community rules

Support Ryan's rebuild — every dollar funds keeping this record public.