Ryan Nichols
motionCourt FilingJune 5, 2026

Floyd v. DOJ — Response stating Anti-Weaponization Fund was not going forward (ECF No. 62)

DOJ stated in a June 5, 2026 filing that the announced fund had not been established and was not going forward. It said no money, claims process, or appointed members existed. This is a government litigation position, not a final merits judgment.

Source: DOJ filing, Floyd v. DOJ, E.D. Va. No. 1:26-cv-01399-LMB, ECF No. 62, via CourtListener/RECAP

0views0shares
Floyd v. DOJ — Response stating Anti-Weaponization Fund was not going forward (ECF No. 62)
Open source →
This record stays public because the work sells, not begs — get the book or get your own case built like this.