Motion in Limine — exclude inflammatory descriptors (p.4)

Page 4 of 5 of Nichols motion in limine arguing against inflammatory descriptors. Cites US v. Johnson (231 F.3d 43) and US v. Ring (706 F.3d 460) regarding prosecutorial limits on inflaming jury passions. Begins Conclusion section.

Source: J6 Scan 32 — Motions / IGPs / Drive

Open at the source →

This record stays public because the work sells, not begs — get the book or get your own case built like this.